Problem set 6 for ASTR 323/423: The Local Universe

Due in class Friday April 18

(1) Individual problem: Sparke and Gallagher Problem 2.9

(2) Group problem for undergrads, individual for grads:

Assume that you are observing stars in a square degree at the NGP, that the thick disk has a scale height of 1 kpc and the thin disk 300 pc, and the halo has an r^-3 density distribution. Furthermore, assume that the ratio of thin to thick to halo stars at the Sun is 1000:100:1 and that the local density of your tracers (halo giants) is 35 per kpc^3. Draw plots of the number of stars per square degree as a function of z height out to 15 kpc. At what distance will the counts of thick disk stars peak? halo stars? (You will need to account for the variation in volume element along the line of sight as well as the variation in star density.)

(3) Individual problem: The stellar luminosity function
Download the Preliminary version of the "Catalog of Nearby Stars 3" (CNS3) of Gliese and Jahreiss, which you can access from http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=V/70A. This catalog gives information on all known stars (in 1991) within 25 pc of the Sun. Within its limitations, this was one of the best volume-limited samples available in astronomy at that time. Use this catalog to calculate the local stellar luminosity function in MV. Make sure you download both the parallax and its error. Things to think about:
(a) There are roughly 3000 stars in the catalog, but they are not uniformly spread in MV. What might be a good binsize to use here?
(b) For what absolute magnitude ranges is this catalog likely to be incomplete? Why?
(c) How might you derive the errors on the luminosity function for each bin?
(d) What units do we usually use for a stellar luminosity function?

(4) Group problem for undergrads, individual for grads:
In this problem you will use data from the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (an all-sky survey in the near IR) to model the distribution of stars in the Milky Way disk. Using the near IR has the advantage that the effect of dust is much smaller. We will use the "red clump": the He-burning stage of stellar evolution which is also referred to as the "red horizontal branch" for older clusters, which is claimed to have an absolute magnitude which does not change much with age or metallicity.
There have been a number of recent papers which have assumed that all stars in a given J-K color range are clump stars with the same absolute magnitude (MK=-1.65) and used the magnitudes of these stars to estimate their distance distribution along the line of sight.
(a) Look at the Hipparcos color-magnitude diagram and identify the red clump on it; you can see that red clump stars are quite common. What is the range of B-V color of the clump stars in this diagram? of absolute magnitude Mv?

Salaris et al (2007: A&A 476, 243) present a Ks vs J-Ks CMD of 47 Tuc, a globular cluster with age around 12 Gyr and metallicity around -0.7. Hesser et al (1987) present B and V photometry of 47 Tuc.
For younger and more metal-rich open clusters, Dias et al A&A 539, A125 (2012) present CMDs for a number of open clusters and derive ages, reddening values and distances.

Work out what color range you should use to identify clump stars in the 2MASS data by plotting the (J-Ks)0 color range for clump stars vs their absolute magnitude Mk in 47 Tuc and the following four open clusters: NGC 2477 ([Fe/H]=+0.07), NGC 2266 ([Fe/H]=-0.38), NGC 2682 (M67, [Fe/H]=0) and NGC 2506 (Fe/H]=-0.19). You will need to work out the reddening in J-Ks towards the clusters. Use the compilation of globular cluster properties at http://physwww.physics.mcmaster.ca/%7Eharris/mwgc.dat for 47 Tuc and the Diaz et al values for the open clusters. Diaz et al give transformations between E(B-V) and E(J-Ks). Do you see any trends with age or metallicity in the color range occupied by the clump? Do you agree with the value of Mk quoted above? Also estimate the position of the turnoff for each of these open clusters, and 47 Tuc.

(b) Download some data from the North Galactic Pole to get a feeling for what a field with almost no reddening looks like. You will need to use the GATOR server, at http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/applications/Gator/. (Use the 2MASS all-sky point-source catalog. There is a tutorial for GATOR.) Use the maximum radius (3600 arcsec), enter galactic coordinates, and download J and Ks colors for everything brighter than Ks=14. Plot Ks vs J-Ks. You may need to download more than one such field to get enough stars in this low-density region.
When you look at a CMD of the field, stars are found at different distances and so a cluster CMD is "blurred" in apparent magnitude in the regions of distance that a given population dominates.
Explain the broad features you see in this diagram, using the information about the color of the clump for stars of different metallicity from part (a), and the positions of the turnoff for both the younger metal-rich open clusters and the old intermediate-metallicity 47 Tuc. What evolutionary states dominate in each region? You should be able to find, and mark on the CMD, the giant branch, clump and two different parts of the main sequence.

(c) With MK=-1.65, and K magnitudes from say 8 to 14, what distances are probed in the Galaxy? Use this information to help interpret your NGP figure: are you seeing stars from the thin disk, thick disk or halo in the different regions of the CMD? Take the metallicity and age distributions of each population into account, looking particularly at the turnoff and the giant branches.

(d) Choose a low-latitude line of sight with a low reddening. Use the maps of Burstein and Heiles (AJ, 87, 1165, 1982) to find a good field. Give (l,b) and E(B-V) and E(J-Ks) for this field. Download data from this direction, plot a de-reddened CMD, calculate distances for each clump star in the sample (justifying your color range), and plot a histogram of distances for the stars. Justify your choie of color range to identify clump stars. Once again, use the distance modulus calculation to work out whether the stars you are using belong to thin disk, thick disk or halo. Does your answer make sense? Why or why not?

(e) (Graduate students only) Using a double exponential disk model for the Milky Way thin disk with realistic estimates for scale length and scale height, predict how the number of stars should vary with distance along the line of sight. Give the equations you use to connect l and b and distance to galactic X,Y,Z coordinates. How good a fit is the model to the data? You should only worry about the variation along the line of sight, not the absolute normalization of number of stars.

(f) (Grad students only) Are there any assumptions that we have made above that are likely to produce significant errors? Explain why. Can you suggest another region of the CMD which might work better than the clump?