The existence of quasars powered by supermassive black holes with
MBH ≈ 109 M☉ at z = 7.5
has been reported by both Banados et al (2018) and Yang et al (2020).
The growth of such objects is constrained by the Eddington limit, which is
the point at which an object becomes so bright that it blows itself apart
via photon pressure.
a) Assuming these beasts grow exponentially at the Eddington-limited rate
with e-folding time τ = 50 Myr,
what was the initial `seed' mass at early times?
(By "early" you may assume t = 0, but think about what difference this
makes.)
[Hint: recall the age-redshift relation from the third homework.
Assume the same vanilla ΛCDM parameters: Ωm = 0.3,
ΩΛ = 0.7, and H0 = 70.]
b) The early universe, as seen in the CMB, is extremely homogeneous.
Structure forms from small initial perturbations that grow as
δ ∼ a. Is this consistent with the result from (a)?
Plot Xe as a function of redshift.
It may help plot redshift as log(1+z).
a) Does this depiction imply that recombination is a sudden event?
b) At what redshift does Xe = 1/2?
c) How does this compare to the value given in Table 8.1?
d) How can it be that Xe > 1 at very high redshift?
[Hint: what is happening around z = 6000?]
ASTR/PHYS 428 only:
Matter remains entangled with the radiation field and no structure can
form until well after recombination.
Plot the matter and radiation (CMB) temperature against redshift.
e) Find the redshift at which Tmatter = 1/2 Trad.
f) What is the optical depth to this redshift? (see eq 8.45 in the book).
g) The observed optical depth is at least τ = 0.06. How does this compare
to you answer in (f)? What causes this difference?