Suppose the Milky Way is discovered to have a new dwarf satellite galaxy with the following properties:
D = 200 kpc | Re = 1 kpc | M* = 105 M☉ |
Method 2: Abundance Matching:
Fig. 6 of the review by
Bullock & Boylan-Kolchin
(arXiv:1707.04256)
shows the relation between stellar mass and halo mass
(and Vmax of the halo) obtained from abundance matching.
Use this graph to
Method 3: MOND
The velocity dispersion estimator for an isolated object in the deep MOND regime is
[You can find the value of a0 on the useful numbers page.]
Distinguishing the predictions:
The best observational accuracy that is typically obtained for the velocity dispersion
in such systems is ± 2 km/s.
ASTR 433 only:
Method 4: the External Field Effect
where Gef ≈ (a0/gex)G.
This quasi-Newtonian regime
has a higher effective value for Newton's constant.
A unique feature of MOND is the external field effect (EFE).
When the external field gex of the host exceeds the internal field of
the dwarf satellite, the velocity dispersion estimator becomes
I.e., is gin > gex or gin < gex?
[To estimate gex, assume the rotation curve of the Milky Way
remains flat at 200 km/s.]
ASTR 433 only:
What would the kinetic energy of such a halo object should it happen to collide with
the Earth? How does this compare with the gravitational binding energy of the Earth?
Cluster | Mgas | ErrMgas | Mtot |
Coma | 5.1 | 1.5 | 17 |
A85 | 0.87 | 0.06 | 4.64 |
A401 | 1.32 | 0.07 | 10.1 |
A478 | 2.38 | 0.21 | 9.28 |
A545 | 1.91 | 0.25 | 10.6 |
A644 | 0.95 | 0.06 | 9.06 |
A665 | 4.37 | 0.46 | 22.1 |
A1413 | 1.83 | 0.23 | 15.9 |
A1650 | 0.75 | 0.08 | 6.37 |
A1689 | 2.12 | 0.16 | 15.5 |
A1763 | 2.61 | 0.22 | 13.2 |
A1795 | 1.13 | 0.08 | 5.49 |
A2009 | 1.44 | 0.10 | 10.6 |
A2029 | 1.26 | 0.11 | 10.3 |
A2142 | 2.84 | 0.15 | 20.1 |
A2163 | 5.46 | 0.49 | 32.5 |
A2319 | 1.73 | 0.12 | 14.2 |
A3186 | 1.76 | 0.23 | 9.50 |
A3266 | 1.42 | 0.07 | 9.07 |
A3888 | 1.20 | 0.15 | 8.66 |